The Standard: Coffee’s Compass in a Collapsing Paradigm
- Krzysztof Blinkiewicz

- Aug 12
- 3 min read
Updated: Sep 5
We don’t need another glossy manifesto. We need a map we can actually walk with — through the ruins of the current coffee system, toward something that doesn’t leave people and the planet behind.
In coffee, the biggest danger is not the burn of a bad roast or the stain of a bitter cup. It’s the slow erosion of meaning.We live in a system where words like “quality,” “sustainability,” and “origin” have been so overused — so commodified — that they no longer tell us anything true.
The Better Coffee Standard is not here to rebrand those words. It’s here to anchor them again in reality. It’s the foundation of a shared language, a constitutional document for those who believe that taste without justice is just another form of extraction.
Why The Standard?
Because without common ground, every movement fractures into isolated slogans. The Glossary in Chapter 0 is not decoration — it’s a survival tool. When a farmer in a rural cooperative, a roaster in a crowded city, and a researcher in a lab speak the same words with the same meaning, cooperation becomes possible. Misinterpretation loses its power.
Naming the Fractures
Chapter 1, the Preamble, doesn’t waste time pretending neutrality. It names the fractures: colonial legacies, the commodification of culture, the false moral comfort of “specialty coffee.” It takes sides — in defense of dignity, ecology, and radical equality. It’s an act of refusal and design at the same time.
More than Philosophy
Chapter 2, Scope and Application, makes it clear: The Standard is not a niche technical manual or a vague manifesto. It’s operational. It binds together growing, roasting, teaching, trading — all under a single values framework. It applies across The Places, licensed trainers, affiliated projects, and public actions bearing the name The Better Coffee. And it’s alive: adaptive, responsive, and never frozen in time.
From Theory to Practice
Chapter 3, Paradigm and Change, connects directly to The White Paper. If The White Paper is the critique, The Standard is the engine. It treats a paradigm not as a set of visible trends, but as the invisible software of thought — the code that decides what questions we can even ask.
Science with a Conscience
In Chapter 4, Scientific Basis, science is not worshipped; it’s held accountable. Evidence matters — but so do people. The Standard refuses the way coffee science has often been used to patent processes, hide harm, and sell exclusivity. Science must serve dignity, not the market.








Comments